Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week

This picture is taken from Front Page Magazine.

The terrified young Iranian girl in this photo was buried alive and then stoned to death for alleged sexual offenses.

This unnamed Iranian teenager is the poster child for Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week (October 22-26, 2007).

Meanwhile, the President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran---a man who oppresses his people, arms our terrorist enemies, kills our soldiers, and kidnaps our diplomats, citizens, and scholars---will be a guest of Columbia University so he can enjoy free speech.

Columbia is giving aid and comfort to a kidnapper and a murderer. Columbia says Ahmadinejad's views will be challenged by young Columbia students. What do young American college kids know about what goes on in Iran? Can young Iranian students challenge and debate Ahmadinejad?

Ahmadinejad has been killing a lot of Iranian people lately. Will the Columbia students confront him with these terrible crimes? Did Columbia ever consider that giving him a respectable platform for his views is saying to all these murdered people and their relatives and friends? And what about all the Iraqis and Americans killed by the Iranian IEDs.

Doesn't the kidnapper-terrorist Ahmadinejad already enjoy free speech in Iran? Can't he buy or coerce enough media and scholars in the Middle East? I think Columbia should have invited a girlfriend of the murdered teenager or the spouses of Americans who have been imprisoned or who have disappeared in Iran.

Meanwhile, I have heard on the news that Columbia doesn't allow ROTC on the campus, so I don't believe Columbia supports free speech. I don't believe this is about dialogue or diplomacy. This is about hating America and supporting our enemies. And often there is money involved, too.

Increasingly, American academics only allow some perspectives to have free speech. They are sympathetic to the terrorists' perspective and don't care at all about our soldiers or about the terrorists' kidnapped and murdered victims.

Ward Churchill, the long-time communist and terrorist mouthpiece who wants "more 9-11s," has said that Americans should rise up and lynch their elected leaders. He says soldiers should "frag" (throw a grenade at) their officers.

Churchill denigrated the 9-11 victims as "little Eichmanns." This is exactly what Churchill did when he mocked and denigrated two FBI agents who were murdered at Pine Ridge Indian reservation by comparing them to General Custer.

Churchill has even suggested that American mothers "snuff" their children and kill themselves. Ward Churchill is an abusive man who admits that he physically abused his young Indian wife Leah Kelly. Leah's sister says that Churchill once tried to push Leah out of a moving car. Leah was killed when she was run over by a car on Arapahoe Road late one night. The newspaper said that Leah was lying in the road drunk and the driver didn't see her.

These are just a few of the reasons why I began to think that there might be some connection between Churchill's Colorado American Indian Movement (AIM) and the murder of JonBenet Ramsey. If you are interested, my blog starts here. It is very complicated, but one of Churchill's historical fabrications may be a clue to solving this murder. Readers need to read the blog starting at the beginning.

Some American academics don't care at all about defending abused and murdered girls in America or in the Middle East. They also hate the men and women who defend our liberties at home and abroad. I know that from studying Ward Churchill. Some academics are not defending freedom; they are bloodthirsty defenders of violent tyrants. Some academics even take money from these political criminals.

Academics would be affronted if ordinary Americans used their "free speech" irresponsibly to advocate that radical academics be incinerated, lynched, or stoned to death. They would be enraged if these ordinary Americans went further and advocated that academics' children should be "snuffed." Yet that's what Ward Churchill advocates for Americans and their children. He advocates the same kind of cruel torture and murder as Iran's ruling psychopath President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and the sadistic former President of Iraq Saddam Hussein.

Even though he denies his citizens free speech, Columbia is defending the "free speech" of Iranian President Ahmadinejad. He is a tyrant who is holding Americans hostage, killing young American and Iraqi soldiers, policemen, and civilians every day in Iraq. Will the families of these people be invited to confront Ahmadinejad with his crimes?

Would an ordinary American who advocated terrorist violence against the Dean of Columbia be given a platform at Columbia? Would an ordinary American who advocated terrorist violence against Ward Churchill be given a platform at the University of Colorado?

I know that universities don't care about defending the liberties of ordinary Americans. For years, the University of Colorado ignored the complaints of ordinary people when they came forward and disclosed Ward Churchill's threats and violence.

Ward Churchill howled to the press when someone allegedly vandalized his parked truck. He complained about the e-mails he got after his 9-11 article "Some People Push Back" became known. Yet he cheered the incineration of New Yorkers, advocated the lynching politicians, celebrated the murder of FBI agents, and wrote about "snuffing" American mothers and babies to protect the environment.

When Ward Churchill says, "it may be that more 9/11s are necessary," he gets paid thousands of dollars at our American universities. Who is paying Churchill's fee?

Ahmadinejad---who says that Israel should not be allowed to exist, who is arming our terrorist enemies, who is murdering our soldiers, who is holding American citizens hostage---is given a platform at Columbia. He denies other people free speech, but Columbia gives him a platform.

I think Columbia is aiding and abetting a kidnapper and a murderer.

Here is what David Horowitz writes about the purpose of Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week:

The plight of Muslim women will be featured at “teach-in” panels and also at sit-ins in Women’s Studies Departments, designed to protest the absence of courses that focus on Islamic gynophobia. The silence of Women’s Studies departments in the face of this oppression is a national outrage. College students are offered the opportunity to study the “oppression” of women in Boston and Beverly Hills in hundreds of Women’s Studies courses across America. But there is not a single course we are aware of that addresses the real oppression of women in Teheran and Riyadh. In Saudi Arabia, to take one horrendous example, Saudi police recently shot to death schoolgirls who were fleeing a burning building without their veils. Better that they should be dead than seen. A pamphlet on the subject of women’s oppression in Islam, written by Robert Spencer and Phyllis Chesler will be distributed on campuses (and posted on Frontpage next week), along with a petition protesting the campus blackout of this issue.

Many campuses will show the uncut version of the ABC miniseries The Path to 9/11, which has been suppressed by ABC under pressure from the Clintons in order to help Hilary’s presidential run. This is the most spectacular episode of political censorship in recent memory. It is also relatively unreported, although the Los Angeles Times carried an informative story which you can read here. The Path to 9/11 was a film that cost $40 million to make and was seen by 28 million viewers, yet ABC has refused to release the DVD. Other films being shown during the Week are Obsession, Suicide Killers, Islam: What the West Needs to Know, Islam v. Islam and Chris Burgard’s Border.

The purpose of Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week is as simple as it is critical: to confront the two Big Lies of the political left: that George Bush created the "war on terror" and that global warming is a greater danger to Americans than global jihad and Islamic supremacism.

Nothing could be more politically incorrect than to point out these unpleasant facts. But nothing could be more important for American students to hear. In the face of the greatest danger Americans have ever confronted, the academic left has mobilized to create sympathy for the enemy and to fight anyone who rallies Americans to defend themselves.

Already, CAIR and the Muslim Students Association -- which are fronts for the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas -- are planning to hold counter- demonstrations during the Week called “Peace Not Prejudice.” Since the Islamic radicals whom these organizations represent and defend are among the most prejudiced people on earth, and since their own sponsoring organizations, Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood, have declared a global war against the West, this can only be regarded as high-order satire. The Muslim Students Association is welcome to sign our petition denouncing Islamo-Fascism and defending the dignity of all individuals, infidels included. It can be accessed here.

Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week is a protest against the censorship that has come to America, and whose chief enforcer is the progressive left. Anyone who links Islamic radicalism to the terrorist campaigns that are being waged against America, Europe and Israel and against non-radical Muslims in places such as Darfur, is automatically labeled an “Islamophobe.” It is by this means that the enemy seeks to paralyze the defenses of its intended victims. The progressive left is the enabler and abettor of the terrorist jihad. It has forged an “unholy alliance” with the most retrograde and reactionary forces in the world today. The institutional base of the left is the university system, from whose classrooms it is conducting a behind-the-lines psychological warfare campaign against its own countrymen and the democratic, secular and tolerant society they have created. It is time for Americans to rally in their own defense and answer the corrosive lies and libels whose goal is to sap their will to fight. Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week is the beginning of that answer and the first line of that defense.

David Horowitz