If We Want Our Children to Be Safe From Terrorists, We Have to Do What Wardo Says!

.....Even though Wardo wants "Amerikkkan settler wymin"* to snuff their babies in their strollers.

*http://www.umich.edu/~uac/threeweeks//storyab21.html?fpvol=3&fpiss=4&vol=3&iss=4&sto=16 :)

The Boulder CU professor Ward Churchill has made a number of threats against American children. CU lets him make threats because he has free speech.
But perhaps Wardo doesn't just make empty threats against children. Perhaps Wardo acts on his openly-expressed convictions. I think he does.

Churchill once wrote that American children should be "snuffed":

"Every yuppie born counts as much as another seventy Chinese...Lay that one on the next soccer mom who approaches you with a baby stroller and an outraged look, demanding that you to put your cigarette out, eh? It is plainly absurd for any American to complain about smoking when you consider the context of the damage done by overall U.S. consumption patterns. Tell ’em you’ll put the butt out when they snuff the kid and not a moment before. Better yet, tell ’em they should snuff themselves, as well as the kid, and do the planet a real favor. Just “kidding” (heh-heh)." http://www.zmag.org/Chiapas1/wardindig.htm

Kidding?

In "Some People Push Back," Churchill explains the 9-11 attacks as payback for killing Iraqi children. Churchill says that IF WE WANT OUR OWN CHILDREN TO BE SAFE that we have to change our policy toward Iraq:

"More bluntly, the hope was – and maybe still is – that Americans, stripped of their presumed immunity from incurring any real consequences for their behavior, would comprehend and act upon a formulation as uncomplicated as 'STOP KILLING OUR KIDS, IF YOU WANT YOUR OWN TO BE SAFE.'" http://www.kersplebedeb.com/mystuff/s11/churchill.html

This is a threat against American children. A lot of "Some People Push Back" is about children. Churchill says our children aren't safe because of our policies. I think that this could be the motive for the attack on JonBenet Ramsey.

The ransom note addressed to JonBenet's father, John Ramsey, said that Mr. Ramsey had to follow the kidnapper's instructions to the letter if he wanted his child returned alive:

"At this time, we have your daughter in our possession. She is safe and unharmed and if you want her to see 1997, you must follow our instructions to the letter...You stand a 99% chance of killing your daughter if you try to outsmart us. Follow our instructions and you stand a 100% of getting her back...It's up to you now John! Victory! S.B.T.C." http://www.cnn.com/US/9703/ramsey.case/documents/note.html

Basically, S.B.T.C. says that if John Ramsey does what he is ordered, that he has a 100% chance of getting his child back alive. The killer was a liar, of course; JonBenet's life was agonizingly snuffed out in a basement torture chamber.

Churchill depicts Americans as cold-hearted about the sanctions on Iraq and American children as spoiled and over-indulged:

"As a whole, the American public greeted these revelations [about suffering due to the sanctions on Iraq] with yawns.. There were, after all, far more pressing things than the unrelenting misery/death of a few hundred thousand Iraqi tikes to be concerned with. Getting "Jeremy" and "Ellington" to their weekly soccer game, for instance, or seeing to it that little "Tiffany" and "Ashley" had just the right roll-neck sweaters to go with their new cords." http://www.kersplebedeb.com/mystuff/s11/churchill.html

Of course, the UN sanctions provided for food and medicine, but Saddam stole/diverted money and supplies that were for his people. Saddam and his sockpuppets blame the US instead of themselves for the suffering of Iraqi children. Churchill, for example, describes the Iraqi children as "vast legions of brown-skinned five-year-olds [who] sat shivering in the dark, wide-eyed in horror, whimpering as they expired in the most agonizing ways imaginable. " http://www.kersplebedeb.com/mystuff/s11/churchill.html

I am wondering if this passage isn't really a sick rationalization for the for strangling and bludgeoning JonBenet Ramsey, a five-year-old who sat shivering in the dark, in wide-eyed horror, whimpering as she expired in the most agonizing ways imaginable. I think that the rationalization for this murder was "STOP KILLING [IRAQI] KIDS, IF YOU WANT YOUR OWN TO BE SAFE." http://www.kersplebedeb.com/mystuff/s11/churchill.html

Professor Ward Kindermord is a nightmare, but he is a white nightmare; not an Indian one. Kindermord disguises himself as an Indian so that people will feel guilty and won't dare to say what I am saying because it might be seen as racism toward a historically-victimized group. This way, Churchill makes us censor ourselves while he has his free speech.

Here are two articles that detail some evidence about the JonBenet Ramsey murder and several "connections" that the killer may have imagined between JonBenet's death and the deaths of Iraqi children.
http://legendofpineridge.blogspot.com/2006/04/allusions-themes-symbols-diction-and.html

http://legendofpineridge.blogspot.com/2006/05/curiouser-and-curiouser-stormin-norman.html